Korody v. Bell, 2009 CanLII 20351 (ON S.C.) In Korody v. Bell, an April 2009 decision by Justice Quinn of the Ontario Superior Court, which was tried over a six-day period in November and December 2008, (and further to the successful motion in this case reported under the 2008 Litigation Successes), we acted for ING, the insurer that provided uninsured automobile coverage, settled with the plaintiff and took an assignment to pursue the defendant vehicle owner, and successfully established that there was implied consent on the part of the owner, thereby recovering the payment made by our client to the plaintiff.

Coachman Insurance v. Lombard, 2009 ONCA 80 (CanLII) This is an appeal by Lombard from an Application holding that Lombard's commercial policy, with a non-owned automobile endorsement, was obliged to defend the Defendant, and the Coachman's standard owner's policy issued to the rental company, was not. The Court of Appeal held that the Judge's ruling was terse enough and the record filed by Coachman insufficient enough that the ruling of the Applications Judge could not stand.